On Mar 17, 2008 15:28 +0900, Akira Fujita wrote: > Hi Andreas, >>> How about renaming this structure from ext4_extent_data to >>> ext4_extent_info which used the extent in-core structure >>> and put it into ext4_fs_extents.h? Because in-core super_block is >>> ext4_sb_info. >>> >>> /* >>> * This is the extent in-core structure. >>> */ >>> struct ext4_extent_info { >>> ext4_lblk_t ee_block; /* first logical block extent covers */ >>> int ee_len; /* number of blocks covered by extent */ >>> ext4_fsblk_t ee_start; /* first physical block extent covers */ >>> }; >> >> Would it be possible to use the FIEMAP interface to get the file mapping >> data to userspace? That would avoid the need to have a second ioctl >> with nearly the same data. > > Reducing ioctl makes sense. > But EXT4_EXTENTS_INFO needs to get the file mapping data > with inode number not file name. > So we should keep ext4_extents_info structure > or put ino entry in fiemap structure. We introduced a special ioctl for this which would allow root to perform ioctl() on any inode by inode number. We call this EXT4_IOC_WRAPPER, and it is called on the root inode and specifies the inode number and real ioctl number before the rest of the ioctl data. struct ext4_ioctl_wrapper { __u32 ioctl_cmd; __u32 padding; __u64 ioctl_ino; char ioctl_data[0]; }; More patch is available, but it isn't in a self-contained patch. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html