On Sep 29, 2018, at 2:40 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi! > > Last year I did some research how Windows and Linux tools handle FAT > labels (boot sector vs root directory) and proposed some unification. > More in thread: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2640891.html > > My proposed change for manipulating with FAT labels is now implemented > in util-linux v2.33, prepared new mtools version, and also in dosfstools > git (unreleased) https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2645732.html > > Project dosfstools contains de-facto standard Linux userspace tools for > FAT filesystems (mkfs.fat, fsck.fat, fatlabel) and so it is quite > important because of high usage of FAT. > > But there was no new release of dosfstools since Jan 2017 and for more > then month I'm unsuccessfully try to contact maintainer of dosfstools > project (Andreas) about future of project itself. > > I do not know what happened, if either Andreas do not have time or > something else... > > So does somebody know what is state of dosfstools project? > > Also there are lot of proposed changes (with patches) for this project > https://github.com/dosfstools/dosfstools/pulls and also more reported > bugs https://github.com/dosfstools/dosfstools/issues > > If Andreas does not have time, can somebody else at least look at pull > requests and do some code review? > > I have some other unpublished/unfinished changes for dosfstools, but I > do not know now if it make sense to invest more time in this project > when maintainer does not respond... if this project is active or going > to be dead... > > If dosfstools is going to be inactive/dead, there is still mtools > project with provides FAT tools too and maintainer of it is now > preparing new bugfix version. So at least some alternative exists. If the current dosfstools maintainer is non-responsive, you could always fork the project in GitHub, land the critical patches into your branch, and make a release on your own. If the maintainer surfaces again, then they can pull in your patches. If not, then you are the new maintainer. Cheers, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
