Re: [PATCH 0/3] fuse: Solve request_find() bottleneck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2 weeks passed, so ping.

Miklos, any reaction on this?

Thanks,
Kirill

On 11.09.2018 13:11, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We noticed the performance bottle neck in FUSE running our
> Virtuozzo storage over rdma. On some types of workload
> we observe 20% of time spent in request_find() in profiler.
> This function is iterating over long list of requests, and it
> scales bad.
> 
> The patch introduces hash table to reduce the number
> of iterations, we do in this function. Also, algorithm
> of generating IDs for interrupt requests is changed,
> simplified request_find() function and killed
> fuse_req::intr_unique field.
> 
> Kirill
> ---
> 
> Kirill Tkhai (3):
>       fuse: Change interrupt requests allocation algorhythm
>       fuse: Kill fuse_req::intr_unique
>       fuse: Use hash table to link processing request
> 
> 
>  fs/fuse/dev.c    |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  fs/fuse/fuse_i.h |   11 +++++------
>  fs/fuse/inode.c  |    5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux