Re: [fuse] What happens with dirty pages on NOTIFY_INVAL_INODE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What happens with dirty pages when a (writeback-cache enabled) FUSE
> filesystem sends a NOTIFY_INVAL_INODE request? Are they dropped?
> flushed?

Haven't tried, but AFAICS it flushes dirty pages and waits on
writeback for these.  However, it doesn't wait on already queued
writes.  So it's a bit of a mess at the moment.

>
> To me neither behaviour seems correct...

What would be the correct operation be if neither flushing not
dropping them is correct?

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux