Re: metadata operation reordering regards to crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:06:44PM +0800, 焦晓冬 wrote:
> Hi, all,
> 
> A probably bit of complex question:
> Does nowadays practical filesystems, eg., extX, btfs, preserve metadata
> operation order through a crash/power failure?

Yes.

Behaviour is filesystem dependent, but we have tests in fstests that
specifically exercise order preservation across filesystem failures.

> What I know is modern filesystems ensure metadata consistency
> after crash/power failure. Journal filesystems like extX do that by
> write-ahead logging of metadata operations into transactions. Other
> filesystems do that in various ways as btfs do that by COW.
> 
> What I'm not so far clear is whether these filesystems preserve
> metadata operation order after a crash.
> 
> For example,
> op 1.  rename(A, B)
> op 2.  rename(C, D)
> 
> As mentioned above,  metadata consistency is ensured after a crash.
> Thus, B is either the original B(or not exists) or has been replaced by A.
> The same to D.
> 
> Is it possible that, after a crash, D has been replaced by C but B is still
> the original file(or not exists)?

Not for XFS, ext4, btrfs or f2fs. Other filesystems might be
different.

Cheers,

Dave,
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux