After looking at the memleak in more detail - I am not convinced that we should be altering the path on all calls to QueryPathInfo when SMB_SHARE_IS_IN_DFS This seems excessive - only a small subset of the directories (or files) in a share which is in the DFS namespace would require a second lookup On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Q (Igor Mammedov) <qwerty0987654321@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Mem leak fix in inode.c > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
