Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 09:47:26 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20180906164358.GI5659@atomide.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looks like next-20180906 now has a regression where mounting
> root won't work with commit fd0002870b45 ("vfs: Implement a
> filesystem superblock creation/configuration context").

Am I right in thinking you're not using any of the LSMs?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
  - From: David Howells
- Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
  - From: Tony Lindgren

References:
- Regression in next with filesystem context concept
  - From: Tony Lindgren

Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] fsnotify fix for 4.19-rc3
Next by Date: [PATCH] vfs: namespace: error pointer dereference in do_remount()
Previous by thread: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
Next by thread: Re: Regression in next with filesystem context concept
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]