Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fsnotify: send path type events to group with super block marks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 30-08-18 18:15:50, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> Send events to group if super block mark mask matches the event
> and unless the same group has an ignore mask on the vfsmount or
> the inode on which the event occurred.
> 
> Soon, fanotify backend is going to support super block marks and
> fanotify backend only supports path type events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>

Two small questions below. Otherwise the patch looks good to me.

> ---
>  fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
...
>  	if (!(mask & FS_MODIFY) &&
>  	    !(test_mask & to_tell->i_fsnotify_mask) &&
> -	    !(mnt && test_mask & mnt->mnt_fsnotify_mask))
> +	    !(mnt && (test_mask & mnt_or_sb_mask)))

When you use mnt_or_sb_mask, the 'mnt' check is useless, right?

>  	iter_info.srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&fsnotify_mark_srcu);
> @@ -364,16 +367,20 @@ int fsnotify(struct inode *to_tell, __u32 mask, const void *data, int data_is,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (mnt && ((mask & FS_MODIFY) ||
> -		    (test_mask & mnt->mnt_fsnotify_mask))) {
> +		    (test_mask & mnt_or_sb_mask))) {
>  		iter_info.marks[FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_INODE] =
>  			fsnotify_first_mark(&to_tell->i_fsnotify_marks);
>  		iter_info.marks[FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_VFSMOUNT] =
>  			fsnotify_first_mark(&mnt->mnt_fsnotify_marks);
> +		if ((mask & FS_MODIFY) ||
> +		    (test_mask & sb->s_fsnotify_mask))

Why is here this additional test? We might need to clear ignore masks on SB
list if nothing else. Also we need to reflect ignore mask from the
superblock marks... I agree there's probably no huge use for either of
these two functionalities but I just don't see a strong reason for
sb & mnt marks to behave differently.

> +			iter_info.marks[FSNOTIFY_OBJ_TYPE_SB] =
> +				fsnotify_first_mark(&sb->s_fsnotify_marks);
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * We need to merge inode & vfsmount mark lists so that inode mark
> -	 * ignore masks are properly reflected for mount mark notifications.
> +	 * We need to merge inode/vfsmount/sb mark lists so that e.g. inode mark
> +	 * ignore masks are properly reflected for mount/sb mark notifications.
>  	 * That's why this traversal is so complicated...
>  	 */
>  	while (fsnotify_iter_select_report_types(&iter_info)) {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux