Re: Tagged pointers in the XArray

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:39:01PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Just a question, please...
> 
> On 08/28/2018 03:27 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > index c74556ea4258..d1b383f3063f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/xarray.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
> > @@ -150,6 +150,54 @@ static inline int xa_err(void *entry)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * xa_tag_pointer() - Create an XArray entry for a tagged pointer.
> > + * @p: Plain pointer.
> > + * @tag: Tag value (0, 1 or 3).
> > + *
> 
> What's wrong with a tag value of 2?

That conflicts with the XArray's internal entries and you get a WARN_ON
when you try to store it in the array.

> and what happens when one is used?  [I don't see anything preventing that.]

Right, there's nothing preventing you from using the value 5 or 19
or 16777216 either ... I did put in a WARN_ON_ONCE to begin with, but
decided that was unnecessary.

Right now our only user uses 0 and 1, so even documenting 3 as a
possibility isn't _necessary_, but some day somebody is going to want
to add FILE_NOT_FOUND
https://thedailywtf.com/articles/What_Is_Truth_0x3f_



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux