Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] vfs: fix sync_file_range syscall on an overlayfs file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For an overlayfs file/inode, page io is operating on the real underlying
> file, so sync_file_range() should operate on the real underlying file
> mapping to take affect.

The man page tells us that this syscall basically gives no guarantees
at all and shouldn't be used in portable programs.

So, I'd just let the non-functionality be for now.   If someone
complains of a regression (unlikely) we can look into it.

Thanks,
Miklos



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux