Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > int mfd = fsmount(...); > > where you pass in an fscontext fd and get out an fd referring to the > root of the filesystem? In this case, maybe fs_open_root(2) would be > a better name. It's not necessarily the root of the filesystem in the sense of sb->s_root. It might be a subset of that, or it might be a part of a filesystem that might have multiple roots because it doesn't know where the real root is (NFS2, for example). > This *definitely* needs to be clearer in the description. I'm open to suggestions of better wording. It's a bit hard to explain because, as you pointed out, the terminology is overloaded. David
