On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, why have you left generic_readlink() sitting around? AFAICS, > it could've been folded into the only remaining caller just as > you've made it static in late 2016... I'll fold it in; > just curious what was the reason for not doing that back then... I don't remember any particular reason. Thanks, Miklos
