> On Jul 13, 2018, at 6:27 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Whilst I'm at it, do we want the option of doing the equivalent of mountat()? > I.e. offering the option to open all the device files used by a superblock > with dfd and AT_* flags in combination with the filename? > Isn’t that more or less what I was suggesting? I suggested dfd and path and I also suggested just an fd and letting the caller open the file itself. > David
