Cool, I look forward to rebaseing my patches when you get around to that. Dave On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:10 -0500, Eric Paris wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 14:38 -0500, Dave Quigley wrote: > > > This patch was tested with NFSv3 mounts and solves all of the > > > regressions that have been introduced in the NFS code. It supports both > > > the binary interface and text options without pushing LSM specific > > > parsing into the FS. It doesn't introduce the new LSM constructs > > > necessary to show these mount options in /proc/mounts suggested by > > > Miklos Szeredi but that will be coming in 2.6.26 (it's not a regression > > > or bug fix). I also do not have the proper security_sb_set_mnt_opts() > > > call in nfs4_get_sb due to a lack of a testing environment, but will add > > > that in 2.6.26 as well. > > > > I see above that the patch does not provide this support for NFSv4. Do > > you intend on adding this in the future or is it being deferred to > > someone else? > > I believe it is just the very same addition to nfs4_get_sb() that i did > in nfs_get_sb and plan to test and do that myself in the next release. > I'm just trying to make this patch as absolutely small as possible while > still fixing all the problems to get it into 2.6.25. > > -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
