On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:05:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:43 AM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > A question regarding the customs in such situations - are previous > > Reviewed-by/Acked-by normally kept across rebases like that? > > Yeah, unless there were big changes, keep the reviewed/acked-by lines. > > Otherwise you'd never be able to handle different people giving > slightly different feedback about separate issues. OK... Miklos, I've pushed #ovl-candidate, with equivalent of the beginning of your branch. I'm *not* saying that I've no remaining issues with your series - this is just how I'd prefer to resolve that group of conflicts. Everything past "vfs: simplify dentry_open()" could live on top of that one, or its equivalent. I'm going to put #work-open3 into -next, let's figure out what to do with the conflicts; what I can promise is never-rebased status for #for-ovl (the beginning of #work-open3 merged into #ovl-candidate).
