Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH v2 1/6] 9p: Fix comment on smp_wmb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:02:20 -0700
Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The previous comment misled me into thinking the barrier wasn't needed
> at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@xxxxxxxx>

>  net/9p/client.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
> index 18c5271910dc..999eceb8af98 100644
> --- a/net/9p/client.c
> +++ b/net/9p/client.c
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ void p9_client_cb(struct p9_client *c, struct p9_req_t *req, int status)
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This barrier is needed to make sure any change made to req before
> -	 * the other thread wakes up will indeed be seen by the waiting side.
> +	 * the status change is visible to another thread
>  	 */
>  	smp_wmb();
>  	req->status = status;




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux