[RFC][PATCH 08/42] make sure do_dentry_open() won't return positive as an error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

An ->open() instances really, really should not be doing that.  There's
a lot of places e.g. around atomic_open() that could be confused by that,
so let's catch that early.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/open.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index 76c56966e297..558802e66e00 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -812,6 +812,10 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f,
 	return 0;
 
 cleanup_all:
+	if (unlikely(error > 0)) {
+		WARN_ON(1);
+		error = -EINVAL;
+	}
 	fops_put(f->f_op);
 	if (f->f_mode & FMODE_WRITER) {
 		put_write_access(inode);
-- 
2.11.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux