Re: [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:13:18 -0500
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180706141141.GA20816@bombadil.infradead.org>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0


On 07/06/2018 09:11 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 08:10:44AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Release *xa_lock* before return.
> 
> Thank you!  I need to improve the test suite to catch that one.
> 

Glad to help. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo

References:
- [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc
  - From: Gustavo A. R. Silva
- Re: [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc
  - From: Matthew Wilcox

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc
Next by Date: [PATCH (v4.18 regression fix)] vfs: don't evict uninitialized inode
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] xarray: Fix lock/unlock imbalance in xa_alloc
Next by thread: [PATCH (v4.18 regression fix)] vfs: don't evict uninitialized inode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux