On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 4:37 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 4:34 PM Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I don't hate that patch, but there are immediate followup questions - e.g. >> how sensitive is relative position of i_lock/i_hash/i_sb? Those are *not* >> close to each other. E.g. what happens if one moves i_hash right after >> i_ino? > > I think that's a separate issue from just packing things better. > > The original patch is at > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=152880180732361&w=2 > > although I certainly agree with the "just re-send as a proper patch, > now with a note on potential performance improvements". > Will do. But first, let me CC this discussion to some public lists, so I have somewhere to refer to in commit message... Thanks, Amir.
