On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:55 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > There should be no need for ioctls. > > Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned you just threw a bunny under > the train for no apparent reason. What have ioctls got to do with > anything? What part of 'interoperability' don't you get here? There is no room for extensions that allow clients+servers to establish arbitrary private protocols. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
