---- On Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:48:40 +0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote ---- > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Huaisheng Ye <yehs2007@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Changes since v1 [1]: > > * Collect Jan's reviewed-by. > > * According to Dan's suggestion, update the unit test infrastructure > > tools/testing/nvdimm/pmem-dax.c for checking the validity of gfn. > > > > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/4/81 > > > > --- > > > > Some functions within fs/dax don't need to get gfn from direct_access. > > Any reason you are calling it 'gfn'? I'm assuming that is a typo and > it should be 'pfn'. Oh, sorry. I made a mistake, it is a typo. I will correct it right now. --- Cheers, Huaisheng Ye
