On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > this series addresses the problems I have identified when trying to understand > how exactly is kernel/audit_tree.c using generic fsnotify framework. I hope > I have understood all the interactions right but careful review is certainly > welcome (CCing Al as he was the one implementing this code originally). > > The patches have been tested by a stress test I have written which mounts & > unmounts filesystems in the directory tree while adding and removing audit > rules for this tree in parallel and accessing the tree to generate events. > Still some real-world testing would be welcome. > This sort of stress test sound really useful to fanotify/inotify as well. Do plan to upstream that stress test? Thanks! Amir.
