On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:02:53PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently we assert that the SCTLR_EL{1,2}_{SET,CLEAR} bits are
> self-consistent with an assertion in config_sctlr_el1(). This is a bit
> unusual, since config_sctlr_el1() doesn't make use of these definitions,
> and is far away from the definitions themselves.
>
> We can use the CPP #error directive to have equivalent assertions in
> <asm/sysreg.h>, next to the definitions of the set/clear bits, which is
> a bit clearer and simpler.
>
> At the same time, lets fill in the upper 32 bits for both registers in
> their repsective RES0 definitions. This could be a little nicer with
Typo: s/repsective/respective/
I've fixed that up locally.
Mark.
