Do we need DCACHE_WHITEOUT_TYPE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

There are some DCACHE_*_TYPE which are not used. I assume they were
added during the development of overlayfs/unionfs and do not seem to
make sense to keep.

Should we revert the following commits?

155e35d4daa8 ("VFS: Introduce inode-getting helpers for layered/unioned fs environments")
e7f7d2253c05 ("VFS: Add a whiteout dentry type")
df1a085af1f6 ("VFS: Add a fallthrough flag for marking virtual dentries")

Are there any more commits related or during this merge which are not
relevant anymore?

Regards,

-- 
Goldwyn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux