Re: shiftfs status and future development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-06-15, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  - Supports any id maps possible for a user namespace
> > 
> > Have we already ruled out storing the container's UID/GID/perms in an
> > extended attribute, and having all the files owned by the owner of
> > the container from the perspective of the unshifted fs.  Then shiftfs
> > reads the xattr and presents the files with the container's idea of
> > what the UID is?
> 
> I've got an experimental patch set that does the *mark* as an xattr. 

I forgot to ask you about this when we all met face-to-face -- can you
go over what the purpose of marking the mounts before being able to
shifts is? When I saw your demo at LPC I was quite confused about what
it was doing (I think you mentioned it was a security feature, but I
must admit I didn't follow the explanation).

-- 
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux