On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, David P. Quigley wrote: > +#define NFS4_MAXLABELLEN 255 I remember raising this before, but I think we need to try and find a better way to implement this than always allocating labels of a fixed and possibly too-small size. What about perhaps starting with a statically allocated array of say 64 bytes (I can't see any labels on my system larger than that), and then falling back to a a dynamic allocation of up to 32k if it turns out to be too small ? i.e. large labels are a slow path and there is no practical limit on label size. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
