On Jun 1, 2018, at 7:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks, > > all that churn without much visible progress to a mergeable codebase > was really ennoying. > > I'd recommend if people want to merge lustre they start with a managable > subset first, e.g. the fs client code with simple IP-only networking. Adding or removing the IB networking makes basically no difference to the code size. This would also make the client much less useful, since a large number of sites use Lustre with IB networks. Cheers, Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
