Re: Proposal for "proper" durable fsync() and fdatasync()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin wrote:
Anyway, the idea of making fsync/fdatasync etc. safe by default is
a good idea IMO, and is a bad bug that we don't do that :(

Agreed... it's also disappointing that [unless I'm mistaken] you have to hack each filesystem to support barriers.

It seems far easier to make sync_blkdev() Do The Right Thing, and magically make all filesystems data-safe.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux