On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:46 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 1:29 AM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Use new return type vm_fault_t for fault handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> index a45f0af..7243e94 100644
>> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c
>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static ssize_t read_vmcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
>> * On s390 the fault handler is used for memory regions that can't be mapped
>> * directly with remap_pfn_range().
>> */
>> -static int mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> +static vm_fault_t mmap_vmcore_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_S390
>> struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Any comment on this patch ? We would like to get this patch in
> queue for 4.18.
If no comment, we would like to get this patch in queue
for 4.18.
