Re: [PATCH] write.2: Partial direct I/O writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Goldwyn,

On 05/21/2018 01:32 PM, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
Direct writes can perform partial writes because large writes
can be broken into smaller chunks by the block layer. Part of
the I/O submitted can fail and the failure is returned to write
as an error in the return value. However, part of the write can
be successful which means that data at the offset is inconsistent.

Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks. Applied.

Cheers,

Michael

diff --git a/man2/write.2 b/man2/write.2
index f8a94f3ff..d6e14aaf0 100644
--- a/man2/write.2
+++ b/man2/write.2
@@ -274,6 +274,14 @@ On Linux,
  returning the number of bytes actually transferred.
  .\" commit e28cc71572da38a5a12c1cfe4d7032017adccf69
  (This is true on both 32-bit and 64-bit systems.)
+.PP
+An error return value while performing
+.BR write()
+using direct I/O does not mean the
+entire write has failed. Partial data may be written
+and the data at the file offset on which the
+.BR write()
+was attempted should be considered inconsistent.
  .SH BUGS
  According to POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4 Section XSI 2.9.7
  ("Thread Interactions with Regular File Operations"):
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux