On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > ... so just make them return 0 when caller does not need to destroy iocb > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> But I think we really need a better name for aio_rw_ret now. Unfortunately I can't think of one.