On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:51:15PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > No, it's not suitable for inclusion. After I sent the above patch, I > realized that it would break some important filesystems (like NFS). > > Eric sounded like he had the best approach to fix it, but it's non- > trivial and somewhat outside the bounds of the locking code. I haven't > had time to attempt a patch for it so far. Thanks, I'll suppress generic/484 for my ext4 testing for now. - Ted
