Re: [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 09:02:03 -0700
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>, darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, clm@xxxxxx, jbacik@xxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180518074918.13816-13-kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)

Completely lacks any explanation, including why this should be
in lib/.  Also should come in the same series with actual users
of the infrastructure.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees
  - From: Kent Overstreet

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] RFC: assorted bcachefs patches
  - From: Kent Overstreet
- [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees
  - From: Kent Overstreet

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/10] don't use spin_lock_irqsave() unnecessarily
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/10] Dynamic fault injection
Previous by thread: [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 06/10] Generic radix trees
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux