Re: [PATCH 0/8][for -mm] mem_notify v6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 2008-02-19 09:00:08, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Kosaki-san wrote:
> > Thank you for wonderful interestings comment.
> 
> You're most welcome.  The pleasure is all mine.
> 
> > you think kill the process just after swap, right?
> > but unfortunately, almost user hope receive notification before swap ;-)
> > because avoid swap.
> 
> There is not much my customers HPC jobs can do with notification before
> swap.  Their jobs either have the main memory they need to perform the
> requested calculations with the desired performance, or their job is
> useless and should be killed.  Unlike the applications you describe,
> my customers jobs have no way, once running, to adapt to less
> memory.

Sounds like a job for memory limits (ulimit?), not for OOM
notification, right?
								Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux