On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:34:14PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT > > > +int kcompat_sys_statfs64(const char __user * pathname, compat_size_t sz, > > > + struct compat_statfs64 __user * buf); > > > +int kcompat_sys_fstatfs64(unsigned int fd, compat_size_t sz, > > > + struct compat_statfs64 __user * buf); > > > +#endif > > > > I've moved these to <linux/compat.h>, so that they live with the rest of > > the compat syscall stuff. That should avoid build failures the kbuild > > test robot picked up where compat_size_t wasn't dfined. > > Please add a comment there, similar to what is in syscalls.h: > > /* > * Kernel code should not call syscalls (i.e., sys_xyzyyz()) directly. > * Instead, use one of the functions which work equivalently, such as > * the ksys_xyzyyz() functions prototyped below. > */ To make the kcompat_sys_* naming scheme clearer, I've added compat references to the above, i.e. /* * Kernel code should not call compat syscalls (i.e., compat_sys_xyzyyz()) * directly. Instead, use one of the functions which work equivalently, such * as the kcompat_sys_xyzyyz() functions prototyped below. */ > Once you have done so, feel free to add my > > Reviewed-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I hope that this still stands with the changes above? Thanks, Mark.
