On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:45:19PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>> Any further comment on this patch ? We would like to get this patch
>> in queue for 4.18.
>
> NAK. This is coplete churn. As said before a proper type for VM faults
> might be useful, but random patches that change bits around aren't.
Not exactly cause we are sending patches in proper planned way
after introducing commit 1c8f422059ae ("mm: change return type to
vm_fault_t") in 4.17-rc1. Except few patches, most of the patches already
finds their way in different maintainers -next tree as well as in
linux-next tree.
