On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:00:30PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Hello. > > This is "(c) Add new hooks." approach I proposed at > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11536.html . > > Although this is an incomplete patch, > I want to know whether you can tolerate this approach or not. > > If you cannot tolerate this approach, may be we need to consider > implementing "(d) Calculate pathname while doing name resolution" approach. > No printable comments, except for that: (e) why don't you guys move the Linus' Serious Mistake to _callers_ of vfs_mknod() and its ilk? Which obviously solves all problems with having vfsmount. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
