On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 04:13:01PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Darrick J. Wong
> <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:37:53AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >> Since set of arguments are so similar, handle in a common helper.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> fs/overlayfs/file.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> >> index ce871a15e185..2ac95c95e8e6 100644
> >> --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> >> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> >> @@ -382,6 +382,90 @@ static long ovl_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >> return ovl_ioctl(file, cmd, arg);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +enum ovl_copyop {
> >> + OVL_COPY,
> >> + OVL_CLONE,
> >> + OVL_DEDUPE,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static s64 ovl_copyfile(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >> + u64 len, unsigned int flags, enum ovl_copyop op)
> >> +{
> >> + struct inode *inode_out = file_inode(file_out);
> >> + struct fd real_in, real_out;
> >> + const struct cred *old_cred;
> >> + s64 ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = ovl_real_fdget(file_out, &real_out);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = ovl_real_fdget(file_in, &real_in);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + fdput(real_out);
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + old_cred = ovl_override_creds(file_inode(file_out)->i_sb);
> >> + switch (op) {
> >> + case OVL_COPY:
> >> + ret = vfs_copy_file_range(real_in.file, pos_in,
> >> + real_out.file, pos_out, len, flags);
> >> + break;
> >> +
> >> + case OVL_CLONE:
> >> + ret = vfs_clone_file_range(real_in.file, pos_in,
> >> + real_out.file, pos_out, len);
> >> + break;
> >> +
> >> + case OVL_DEDUPE:
> >> + ret = vfs_dedupe_file_range_one(real_in.file, pos_in,
> >> + real_out.file, pos_out, len);
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + revert_creds(old_cred);
> >> +
> >> + /* Update size */
> >> + ovl_copyattr(ovl_inode_real(inode_out), inode_out);
> >> +
> >> + fdput(real_in);
> >> + fdput(real_out);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static ssize_t ovl_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >> + size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> >> +{
> >> + return ovl_copyfile(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len, flags,
> >> + OVL_COPY);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int ovl_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len)
> >> +{
> >> + return ovl_copyfile(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len, 0,
> >> + OVL_CLONE);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static s64 ovl_dedupe_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >> + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> >> + u64 len)
> >> +{
> >> + /*
> >> + * Don't copy up because of a dedupe request, this wouldn't make sense
> >> + * most of the time (data would be duplicated instead of deduplicated).
> >> + */
> >> + if (!ovl_inode_upper(file_inode(file_in)) ||
> >> + !ovl_inode_upper(file_inode(file_out)))
> >> + return -EPERM;
> >
> > /me wonders, why not EOPNOTSUPP? That's what we've been using (in xfs
> > anyway) for "filesystem doesn't want to let you do this".
>
> EOPNOTSUPP might be interpreted as "this filesystem doesn't support
> dedupe", even though here it's just "these two particular files don't
> support dedupe".
ocfs2 already uses EOPNOTSUPP for 'these two particular files don't
support dedupe/reflink'. Granted, the manpage would seem to leave open
the possibility of using EOPNOTSUPP or EINVAL for the "can't do it to
these two files" case.
--D
> >
> > (Or I guess EXDEV, but "cross-device link not supported" might not be
> > quite what you want users to see...)
>
> Hmm, I like EPERM better. EPERM means something like "you can't do
> this for some unspecified reason". This is exactly the case here.
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
