On 5/2/18 10:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:57:39AM -0700, adam.manzanares@xxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Adam Manzanares <adam.manzanares@xxxxxxx> >> >> This is the per-I/O equivalent of the ioprio_set system call. >> >> When the RWF_IOPRIO flag is set then the aio_reqprio field of the iocb >> is interpreted as an I/O scheduling class and priority. > > I think this belongs into the IOCB_FLAG_* flags namespace for aio_flags > field as it isn't a field valid for plain read/write. > > Also you probably want to merge both patches as they only really > make sense together. > I will make the changes and send out a v2.
