Re: BTRFS partition usage...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller wrote:
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:08:59 -0500

I've had requests to move the super down to 64k to make room for
bootloaders, which may not matter for sparc, but I don't really plan
on different locations for different arches.

The Sun disk label sits in the first 512 bytes and the boot loader
block sits in the second 512 bytes.

I think leaving even more space is a good idea for several reasons.


Yep. I chose 32K unused space in the prototype filesystem I wrote [1, 2.4 era]. I'm pretty sure I got that number from some other filesystem, maybe even some NTFS incarnation. It's just good practice to avoid the first and last "chunks" of a partition, FSVO chunk.

	Jeff


[1] http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/ibu/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux