On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 04:28:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 13-04-18 16:20:00, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > We would need kmalloc-reclaimable-X variants. It could be worth it, > > especially if we find more similar usages. I suspect they would be more > > useful than the existing dma-kmalloc-X :) > > I am still not sure why __GFP_RECLAIMABLE cannot be made work as > expected and account slab pages as SLAB_RECLAIMABLE Can you outline how this would work without separate caches?
