On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 09-04-18 20:25:06, Chao Yu wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > index c85cccc2e800..cc63f8c448f0 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c > > @@ -339,10 +339,10 @@ struct inode *f2fs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino) > > make_now: > > if (ino == F2FS_NODE_INO(sbi)) { > > inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &f2fs_node_aops; > > - mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_ZERO); > > + mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS); > > An unrelated question. Why do you make all allocations for the mapping > NOFS automatically? What kind of reclaim recursion problems are you > trying to prevent? It's worth noting that this is endemic in filesystems. $ git grep mapping_set_gfp_mask.*FS drivers/block/loop.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, lo->old_gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_IO|__GFP_FS)); fs/btrfs/disk-io.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/f2fs/inode.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_ZERO); fs/f2fs/inode.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_F2FS_ZERO); fs/gfs2/glock.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(ip->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/jfs/super.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/nilfs2/gcinode.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/nilfs2/page.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/reiserfs/xattr.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(mapping, GFP_NOFS); fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c: mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, (gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_FS)));