Re: [PATCH 00/20] afs: Fixes and development

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Now, the conflicts really do look entirely trivial, and that's not the
> problem, but the fact that you *didn't* re-send the AFS pull request
> makes me wonder if you perhaps didn't want me to pull it after all?

Sorry: Al pointed out that I was incorrectly using lookup_one_len().  I
proposed a fix, but he decided that he wanted to rejig lookup_one_len()
instead, so I was waiting for that.

Al: Can you rebase your vfs/work.dcache branch on top of linus/master (I think
the rest of your branch is pulled already)?  Or should I just merge together
the fscache patches with it and rebase my afs-next branch off of that?

David



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux