On 20/03/18 03:16, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi Matthew, > > This playing with signals to allow only fatal signals appears to predate > the introduction of wait_event_killable(), and I'm fairly sure that > wait_event_killable is what was meant to happen here. Predates is an understatement, this is really, really old code. Do I need to forward this to Al or Andrew? > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/autofs4/waitq.c | 27 +-------------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c > index a0c57c37fa21..c160e9b3aa0f 100644 > --- a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c > +++ b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c > @@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ > */ > static autofs_wqt_t autofs4_next_wait_queue = 1; > > -/* These are the signals we allow interrupting a pending mount */ > -#define SHUTDOWN_SIGS (sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGINT) | sigmask(SIGQUIT)) > - > void autofs4_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi) > { > struct autofs_wait_queue *wq, *nwq; > @@ -486,29 +483,7 @@ int autofs4_wait(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi, > * wq->name.name is NULL iff the lock is already released > * or the mount has been made catatonic. > */ > - if (wq->name.name) { > - /* Block all but "shutdown" signals while waiting */ > - unsigned long shutdown_sigs_mask; > - unsigned long irqflags; > - sigset_t oldset; > - > - spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sighand->siglock, irqflags); > - oldset = current->blocked; > - shutdown_sigs_mask = SHUTDOWN_SIGS & ~oldset.sig[0]; > - siginitsetinv(¤t->blocked, shutdown_sigs_mask); > - recalc_sigpending(); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->sighand->siglock, irqflags); > - > - wait_event_interruptible(wq->queue, wq->name.name == NULL); > - > - spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->sighand->siglock, irqflags); > - current->blocked = oldset; > - recalc_sigpending(); > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->sighand->siglock, irqflags); > - } else { > - pr_debug("skipped sleeping\n"); > - } > - > + wait_event_killable(wq->queue, wq->name.name == NULL); The wait event code looks like this will wake up on most any unmasked signal. But my assumption is that TASK_KILLABLE tasks are only forwarded specific signals ... Is that right or am I missing something? > status = wq->status; > > /* >