On 03/16/2018 09:10 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 02:13:42PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> When the CTL_FLAGS_CLAMP_RANGE flag is set in the ctl_table >> entry, any update from the userspace will be clamped to the given >> range without error if either the proc_dointvec_minmax() or the >> proc_douintvec_minmax() handlers is used. > I don't get it. Why define a generic range flag when we can be mores specific and > you do that in your next patch. What's the point of this flag then? > > Luis I was thinking about using the signed/unsigned bits as just annotations for ranges for future extension. For the purpose of this patchset alone, I can merge the three bits into just two. Cheers, Longman
