Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:53:55 +0000
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1520885744-1546-7-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:15:44PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> Add a range clamping test for the msgmni sysctl parameter to verify

No! We don't want to test production values, please add a new test
entry which is similar but does *not* modify system production values!

  Luis

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test
  - From: Waiman Long

References:
- [PATCH v4 0/6] ipc: Clamp *mni to the real IPCMNI limit
  - From: Waiman Long
- [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test
  - From: Waiman Long

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ipc: Clamp semmni to the real IPCMNI limit
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] proc/sysctl: Check for invalid flags bits
Previous by thread: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] test_sysctl: Add range clamping test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux