On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:19 AM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:41:04PM -0500, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> ...
>> +static inline bool audit_containerid_set(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> the calls to audit_containerid_set() confused me. Could you make it
> is_audit_containerid_set() or audit_containerid_isset()?
I haven't gone through the entire patchset yet, but I wanted to
quickly comment on this ... I really dislike the
function-names-as-sentences approach and would would greatly prefer
audit_containerid_isset().
>> +{
>> + return audit_get_containerid(tsk) != INVALID_CID;
>> +}
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
