On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 02:21:40PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: >> They are indeed a hodge-podge. The problem is that the current >> IS_DAX() is broken. So I'd like to propose fixing IS_DAX() with >> IS_FSDAX() + IS_DEVDAX() for 4.16-rc4 and queue up these wider reworks >> you propose for the next merge window. > > The only thing broken about IS_DAX are the code elimination games > based on the CONFIG_* flags. Remove those and just add proper stubs > for the dax routines and everything will be fine for now until we can > kill that inode flag. > > IS_FSDAX and IS_DEVDAX on the other hand are a giant mess that isn't > helping anyone. Ok, I'll take another shot at something suitable for 4.16, but without these new helpers...
