Re: [Cluster-devel] a few I_DIRTY* related cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] a few I_DIRTY* related cleanups
From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:18:56 +0000
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ntfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180221155449.25542-1-hch@lst.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0



On 21/02/18 15:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

Move I_DIRTY_INODE to fs.h, and use the I_DIRTY* defines more consistently.

Thanks - looks good to me:
Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>

Steve.

References:
- a few I_DIRTY* related cleanups
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysctl: Add range clamping intvec helper functions
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Directed kmem charging
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/4] gfs2: fix bogus __mark_inode_dirty(I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) calls
Next by thread: Re: a few I_DIRTY* related cleanups
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux