On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 03:25 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This patch really ought to be broken into more manageable atomic > > changes to make it easier to review, and to provide more fine-grained > > explanation and rationalization for each specific change via > > individual patch descriptions. > > Hmmm.... I broke the patch up as Trond stipulated - at least, I thought I > had. > > In many ways this request doesn't make sense. You can't do NFS caching > without all the appropriate bits, so logically they should be one patch. > Breaking it up won't help git-bisect since the option to enable all this is > the last (or nearly last) patch. That depends entirely on what you are tracking. At this point in time, I'm completely uninterested in debugging cachefs, but _very_ interested in tracking and debugging changes to core NFS code. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
